11/2/2020
Study Identifies Pitfall for Correcting Mutations in Human Embryos with CRISPR

In a paper published on October 28, 2020 in the journal Cell, scientists describe unexpected, undesirable outcomes after editing genes in human embryos with CRISPR, a genomic editing system. 

The study, the most detailed analysis to date of CRISPR in human embryos, shows that applying gene editing technology to repair a blindness-causing gene early in the development of a human embryo often eliminates an entire chromosome or a large section of it. 

"Our study shows that CRISPR/Cas9 is not yet ready for clinical use to correct mutations at this stage of human development,” says the study’s senior author Dieter Egli, assistant professor of developmental cell biology in the Department of Pediatrics at Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons.  

CRISPR in human embryos

The genome editing system called CRISPR/Cas9 has revolutionized molecular biology in recent years, and its discoverers were honored with this year's Nobel Prize in chemistry. The system allows scientists to make precise changes in the genomes of cultured cells, living tissues, and animal embryos.

The first use of CRISPR in human embryos was reported in 2015. Then in 2018, He Jiankui claimed to have performed the procedure in a pair of twin embryos, eliciting a firestorm of condemnation from scientists and government officials worldwide. 

CRISPR can lead to chromosomal abnormalities

In the new paper, Egli and his colleagues tested CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing's effects on early-stage human embryos carrying a mutation in a gene called EYS (eyes shut homolog), which causes hereditary blindness.

“We know from previous studies in differentiated human cells and in mice that a break in the DNA results in mostly two outcomes: precise repair or small local changes. At the EYS gene, these changes can yield a functional gene, though it is not a perfect repair,” says Michael Zuccaro, a research scientist at Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and co-lead author of the paper. 

When Zuccaro, Egli, and their colleagues looked at the entire genomes of the modified embryos in this study, they identified another outcome. “We learned that in human embryonic cells, a single break in the DNA can result in a third outcome—the loss of an entire chromosome or sometimes a large segment of that chromosome, and this loss of the chromosome is very frequent,” says Zuccaro. 

In 2017, a study reported the successful correction of a heart disease-causing mutation in normal human embryos using CRISPR. Comprehensive data from the new study offer a different interpretation of these results: Instead of being corrected, the chromosome carrying the mutation may have been lost altogether. 

"If our results had been known two years ago, I doubt that anyone would have gone ahead with an attempt to use CRISPR to edit a gene in a human embryo in the clinic," Egli says. “Our hope is that these cautionary findings should discourage premature clinical application of this important technology but can also guide responsible research to achieve its ultimate safe and effective use.”  

Why this research is done

Mutations in the DNA can cause disease, including diabetes, heart disease, blindness, and many other disorders. Editing of the genome in the embryo might be one way to prevent heritable human disease. Gene therapy of adult cells holds great promise to treat heritable disorders, and is already approved by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services for a form of childhood blindness, but its efficacy depends on the number of cells that can be reached, and the reversibility of the damage, According to the 2020 report on human heritable genome editing by the International Commission on the Clinical Use of Human Germline Genome Editing, the use of CRISPR or other genomic editing techniques to alter genes in a human embryo could be meaningful when the prospective parents' genetics prevent them from conceiving an embryo without debilitating mutations, and if it can be done safely.   

Though CRISPR/Cas9 has proven to be a quick, reliable way to engineer cells and laboratory animals such as mice, very few studies until now have looked so comprehensively at the technique's efficacy in human embryos.

https://www.cuimc.columbia.edu/news/study-identifies-pitfall-correcting-...

References 

The study was published Oct. 29 in Cell in a paper titled “Allele-specific chromosome removal after Cas9 cleavage in human embryos(link is external and opens in a new window).”

Other authors: Jia Xu (Genomic Prediction Inc., New Brunswick, NJ), Carl Mitchell (CUIMC), Diego Marin (Genomic Prediction Inc.), Raymond Zimmerman (Genomic Prediction Inc.), Bhavini Rana (Genomic Prediction Inc. and Rutgers University), Everett Weinstein (CUIMC), Rebeca T. King (CUIMC), Katherine L. Palmerola (CUIMC), Morgan E. Smith (CUIMC), Stephen H. Tsang (CUIMC), Robin Goland (CUIMC), Maria Jasin (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Rogerio Lobo (CUIMC), and Nathan Treff (Genomic Prediction Inc. and Rutgers).

The U.S. government bans the use of federal funding to conduct research on human embryos, but the researchers were able to secure private funding from the New York Stem Cell Foundation and the Russell Berrie Foundation Program in Cellular Therapies to conduct the study.

Jia Xu, Raymond Zimmerman, Bhavini Rana, Diego Marin, and Nathan Treff are employees or shareholders of Genomic Prediction. Stephen Tsang was a consultant for SPARK Therapeutics and has grants from Abeona Therapeutics. Dieter Egli is a member of the Cell Advisory Board.